<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: My Beloved Water	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://drylab2023.net/2017/05/23/beloved-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://drylab2023.net/2017/05/23/beloved-water/</link>
	<description>Enacting the near future of water scarcity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 02:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Renaissance		</title>
		<link>https://drylab2023.net/2017/05/23/beloved-water/#comment-43</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Renaissance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 02:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drylab2023.net/?p=2022#comment-43</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Got a lot of moral and ethical issues going on here. I was thinking as reading this, how easy it would be for someone to just sneak over and take a little extra water hoping that no one would notice and bamn, you say that you were day dreaming about drenching yourself with the hose. I guess everyone else was lucky that tower sprung a leak, lol. Real talk though, that is a serious issue with collective action problems, free-riding. Like in the prisoner&#039;s dilemma, if everyone participates and lives up to their end of the bargain, no matter how much discomfort there is in the short-run, then all are better off in the long-run. However, the incentive in the short-run is not to participate and live up to one&#039;s end of the bargain and for everyone to seek to benefit their self. Yet, if and when that occurs then all the people are made worse off. The violation of a collective action or communal problem is only beneficial to the free-riders if others live up to their end of the deal. I was happy to hear, that at least for this day, everyone was living up to their end of the bargain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a lot of moral and ethical issues going on here. I was thinking as reading this, how easy it would be for someone to just sneak over and take a little extra water hoping that no one would notice and bamn, you say that you were day dreaming about drenching yourself with the hose. I guess everyone else was lucky that tower sprung a leak, lol. Real talk though, that is a serious issue with collective action problems, free-riding. Like in the prisoner&#8217;s dilemma, if everyone participates and lives up to their end of the bargain, no matter how much discomfort there is in the short-run, then all are better off in the long-run. However, the incentive in the short-run is not to participate and live up to one&#8217;s end of the bargain and for everyone to seek to benefit their self. Yet, if and when that occurs then all the people are made worse off. The violation of a collective action or communal problem is only beneficial to the free-riders if others live up to their end of the deal. I was happy to hear, that at least for this day, everyone was living up to their end of the bargain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
